Perfil nutricional, valor biológico y aceptabilidad general de panes: evaluación comparativa de formulaciones tradicionales, enriquecidas y sin gluten.

Autores/as

  • Alejandrina Sotelo Méndez
  • Diego Fernando García Ramón Universidad
  • Edgar Norabuena
  • Marlitt Naupay Vega
  • Liliana Sumarriva
  • Hermelinda Álvarez
  • Janella Anchayhua Torres
  • Edgar Zarate Sarapura
  • Mariella Van Heurck

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12873/

Palabras clave:

Whole-grain breads, biological value, dietary fiber, polyphenols, acceptability.

Resumen

Introducción: El pan mantiene su relevancia en la dieta global pese a los cambios en estilos de vida. La industria panadera ha evolucionado para satisfacer nuevas demandas nutricionales y preferencias, especialmente en panes integrales y sin gluten.

Objetivo: Evaluar comparativamente las características nutricionales, biológicas y sensoriales de panes integrales, sin gluten y francés.

Materiales y métodos: Se desarrollaron tres formulaciones: pan integral (PI), pan francés (PF) y pan libre de gluten con kiwicha (PLGK). Se analizó su composición proximal, estructura alveolar, volumen específico, polifenoles totales, fibra dietaria y parámetros biológicos. Las muestras fueron almacenadas a 25°C y 80% HR, evaluando características sensoriales durante siete días.

Resultados y discusiones: El PI destacó con mayor contenido proteico (14,10%), minerales (4,15%), fibra dietaria total (19,49%), polifenoles totales (114,23 mg AGE/100g) y superiores parámetros biológicos (VB: 70%, DA: 76%, BN: 0,64, NPR: 6,25, PER: 4,81). El PLGK mostró mejor puntuación sensorial durante el almacenamiento.

Conclusiones: El PI emergió como la opción más equilibrada nutricionalmente, demostrando que la incorporación estratégica de harinas funcionales mejora significativamente el perfil nutricional sin comprometer severamente las características tecnológicas. Se recomienda su consumo por su impacto positivo en la calidad nutricional y sensorial, representando una alternativa viable para la alimentación saludable.

Referencias

Boukid F, Rosell CM. The nutritional quality of wholegrain and multigrain breads is not necessarily better than white breads: the case of gluten-free and gluten-containing breads. Int J Food Sci Nutr [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 Aug 24];73(7):902–14. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09637486.2022.2086974

Cetiner B, Koksel H. Comparison of quality, dietary fiber and glycemic index of whole wheat breads using various modern and old wheats and investigate the effect of xylanase. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization [Internet]. 2024 Jun 1 [cited 2024 Aug 24];18(6):4484–95. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11694-024-02509-7

Avberšek Lužnik I, Lušnic Polak M, Demšar L, Gašperlin L, Polak T. Does type of bread ingested for breakfast contribute to lowering of glycaemic index? J Nutr Intermed Metab. 2019 Jun 1;16:100097.

Repo-Carrasco-Valencia R, Vidaurre-Ruiz J, Luna-Mercado GI. Development of Gluten-Free Breads Using Andean Native Grains Quinoa, Kañiwa, Kiwicha and Tarwi. Proc West Mark Ed Assoc Conf. 2020;53(1):15.

Valencia-Chamorro S. Encyclopedia of Food Grains: Quinoa, Overview. Second Edi. Gran Bretaña: Second Edition; 2016.

Miranda-Ramos KC, Sanz-Ponce N, Haros CM. Evaluation of technological and nutritional quality of bread enriched with amaranth flour. Lwt. 2019;114(June):108418.

Montero-Quintero CarolinaK, Moreno-rojas R, Molina AlíE, Beatriz A, Montero-quintero KC, Molina EA, et al. REGIMENES DIETÉTICOS. Asociación Intercienia. 2015;40:473–8.

Hegazy AI, Haitham AZ, El-khamissi. NUTRITIONAL PROTEIN QUALITY EVALUATION OF. 2020;(December 2017).

Reyes MJ, De Palomo P, Bressani R. Desarrollo de un producto de panificación apto para el adulto mayor a base de harina de trigo y harina de arroz. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 2004;54(3):314–21.

García-Ramón F, Alvarez H, Sotelo-Méndez A, Huaman-Gonzáles T, Norabuena E, Sarapura-Zarate E, et al. Calidad nutricional , evaluación física , sensorial y biológica en panes convencionales y libres de gluten Nutritional quality and evaluation physic , sensory and biological of conventional and gluten-free breads. 2022;42(1):106–14.

AOAC. Association of Officiating Analytical Chemists. Washington DC; 2005.

Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventós RM. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1999;299:152–78.

Malik H. Optimisation of Process for Development of Nutritionally Enriched Multigrain Bread. J Food Process Technol [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 Jun 29];07(01). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289488476_Optimisation_of_Process_for_Development_of_Nutritionally_Enriched_Multigrain_Bread

Gambus H, Gambus F, Sabat R. The research on quality improvement of gluten-free bread by amaranthus flour addition | Request PDF [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2024 Jun 27]. p. 92–111. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284511331_The_research_on_quality_improvement_of_gluten-free_bread_by_amaranthus_flour_addition

Alvarez-Jubete L, Arendt EK, Gallagher E. Nutritive value of pseudocereals and their increasing use as functional gluten-free ingredients. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2010 Feb 1;21(2):106–13.

Gorinstein S, Pawelzik E, Delgado-Licon E, Haruenkit R, Weisz M, Trakhtenberg S. Characterisation of pseudocereal and cereal proteins by protein and amino acid analyses.

Kozioł MJ. Chemical composition and nutritional evaluation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 1992 Mar 1;5(1):35–68.

Aubrecht E, Biacs PÁ. Characterization of buckwheat grain proteins and its products. Acta Aliment. 2001 Mar;30(1):71–80.

Drzewiecki J, Delgado-Licon E, Haruenkit R, Pawelzik E, Martin-Belloso O, Park YS, et al. Identification and differences of total proteins and their soluble fractions in some pseudocereals based on electrophoretic patterns. J Agric Food Chem [Internet]. 2003 Dec 17 [cited 2024 Jun 28];51(26):7798–804. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14664548/

Paciulli M, Rinaldi M, Cirlini M, Scazzina F, Chiavaro E. Chestnut flour addition in commercial gluten-free bread: A shelf-life study. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 2016;70:88–95.

Cornicelli M, Saba M, Machello N, Silano M, Neuhold S. Nutritional composition of gluten-free food versus regular food sold in the Italian market. Dig Liver Dis [Internet]. 2018 Dec 1 [cited 2024 Jun 27];50(12):1305–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29857960/

García-Ramón F, Sotelo-Méndez A, Alvarez-Chancasanampa H, Norabuena E, Sumarriva L, Yachi K, et al. Influence of Peruvian Andean grain flours on the nutritional, rheological, physical, and sensory properties of sliced bread. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2023 Aug 24;7:1202322.

Angioloni A, Collar C. Nutritional and functional added value of oat, Kamut ®, spelt, rye and buckwheat versus common wheat in breadmaking. J Sci Food Agric. 2011 May;91(7):1283–92.

Capriles VD, Arêas JAG. Novel approaches in gluten-free breadmaking: Interface between food science, nutrition, and health. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2014;13(5):871–90.

Matos Segura ME, Rosell CM. Chemical composition and starch digestibility of different gluten-free breads. Plant Foods Hum Nutr [Internet]. 2011 Sep [cited 2024 Jun 27];66(3):224–30. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21769691/

Turkut GM, Cakmak H, Kumcuoglu S, Tavman S. Effect of quinoa flour on gluten-free bread batter rheology and bread quality. J Cereal Sci. 2016;69:174–81.

Del Castillo V, Lescano G, Armada M. Foods formulation for people with celiac disease based on quinoa (Chenopoduim quinoa), cereal flours and starches mixtures. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 2009;39(3):332–6.

Mikulec A, Kowalski S, Makarewicz M, Skoczylas Ł, Tabaszewska M. Cistus extract as a valuable component for enriching wheat bread. LWT. 2020 Jan 1;118:108713.

Sȩczyk Ł, ͆wieca M, Gawlik-Dziki U. Effect of carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) flour on the antioxidant potential, nutritional quality, and sensory characteristics of fortified durum wheat pasta. Food Chem. 2016;194:637–42.

Miranda-Ramos KC, Sanz-Ponce N, Haros CM. Evaluation of technological and nutritional quality of bread enriched with amaranth flour. Lwt. 2019;114(June):108418.

Zhang D, Moore WR. Effect of Wheat Bran Particle Size on Dough Rheological Properties. J Sci Food Agric [Internet]. 1997 [cited 2024 Aug 24];74:490–6. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions

Khalid KH, Ohm JB, Simsek S. Whole wheat bread: Effect of bran fractions on dough and end-product quality. J Cereal Sci. 2017 Nov 1;78:48–56.

Pérez K, Elías C, Delgado V. High-protein snack: an extruded from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), tarwi (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet), and sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.). Scientia Agropecuaria. 2017;8(4):377–88.

Sotelo. M A, Bernuy-Osorio N, Perez FV, Anticona EP, Ureña M, Vílchez-Perales C. Cookie processed with quinoa flour, tara endosperm and agave leaves fibers: Biological value and global acceptability. Scientia Agropecuaria. 2019;10(1):73–8.

Rizzello CG, Lorusso A, Montemurro M, Gobbetti M. Use of sourdough made with quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) flour and autochthonous selected lactic acid bacteria for enhancing the nutritional, textural and sensory features of white bread. Food Microbiol. 2016;56:1–13.

Espinosa-Ramírez J, Garzon R, Serna-Saldivar SO, Rosell CM. Functional and nutritional replacement of gluten in gluten-free yeast-leavened breads by using β-conglycinin concentrate extracted from soybean flour. Food Hydrocoll. 2018;84:353–60.

Descargas

Publicado

11-06-2025

Cómo citar

[1]
2025. Perfil nutricional, valor biológico y aceptabilidad general de panes: evaluación comparativa de formulaciones tradicionales, enriquecidas y sin gluten. Nutrición Clínica y Dietética Hospitalaria. 45, 2 (Jun. 2025). DOI:https://doi.org/10.12873/.

Artículos similares

1-10 de 151

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a